Question · asked by 1 review

Adhesive precoated (APC) flash-free brackets (minimal excess adhesive) vs Conventional ceramic brackets: Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score)

Population
Orthodontic patients of any age with fixed braces (new DLs assessed at debond)
Intervention
Adhesive precoated (APC) flash-free brackets (minimal excess adhesive)
Comparison
Conventional ceramic brackets
Outcome
Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score)

Adhesive precoated flash-free brackets showed no demineralization difference, with certainty not graded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Adhesive precoated flash-free brackets vs Conventional ceramic brackets
Enamel demineralization (DIAGNOdent score) · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · Baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after bonding, Fixed orthodontic treatment
Adhesive precoated flash-free brackets showed no demineralization difference, with certainty not graded.
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
Intergroup evaluation showed that there were no statistically significant differences in demineralization measurements between all sides of the conventional and flash-free brackets at all the time intervals (p >0.05).1 study · 30 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.