Question · asked by 1 review

38% SDF varnish plus oral health instruction vs oral health instruction plus water: new root-surface carious lesions or restorations

Population
Older adults with root caries in permanent (mature) teeth (mean age 75 years)
Intervention
38% SDF varnish plus oral health instruction
Comparison
oral health instruction plus water
Outcome
new root-surface carious lesions or restorations

SDF had a 71% preventative fraction at 36 months; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
38% SDF varnish plus oral health instruction vs oral health instruction plus water
new root-surface carious lesions or restorations · older adults with root caries · 36 months, Hong Kong
SDF had a 71% preventative fraction at 36 months; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes
Preventative fraction (%) 711 study · 306 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth.
2023 All outcomes
December 202213Low / Critically Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.