Question · asked by 1 review
Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics vs placebo or no treatment: Participant satisfaction
- Population
- Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general anaesthesia (secondary care)
- Intervention
- Primary outcome: topical local anaesthetics
- Comparison
- placebo or no treatment
- Outcome
- Participant satisfaction
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Topical local anaesthetic (spray or dental swab) vs Placebo or no treatment Participant satisfaction · Children and young people aged 17 years or younger having dental treatment (including extractions) under general… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for… (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes | None of the studies reported on patient or child satisfaction | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and… 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2014-01-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.