Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy: Dry eye symptoms, measured using the OSDI score (ranging from 0 to 100 units, with a reduction in scores indicating clinical improvement) at 1‐month (with actual
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy showed no clear difference in dry eye symptoms, measured using the OSDI score (ranging from 0 to… compared with conventional therapy alone (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy vs conventional therapy alone Dry eye symptoms, measured using the OSDI score (ranging from 0 to 100 units, with a reduction in scores indicating clinical improvement) at 1‐month (with actual · people with dry eyea Oral omega‐3 PUFAs plus conventional therapy showed no clear difference in dry eye symptoms, measured using the OSDI score (ranging from 0 to… compared with conventional therapy alone (low certainty). Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 70 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omega‐3 and omega‐6 polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.