Summary of findings table ‐ Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training vs control: Mental health outcomes
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training changes individual mental health compared with control (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training vs control Individual mental health · improving mental health and wellbeing It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training changes individual mental health compared with control (very low certainty). Mental Health First Aid as a tool for improving mental health and well‐being (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.88 [0.61, 1.28] | 3 studies · 3939 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mental Health First Aid as a tool for improving mental health and well‐being 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.