Question · asked by 1 review
Acupuncture vs sham: Withdrawals due to adverse events
- Population
- patients with hip osteoarthritis
- Intervention
- Acupuncture
- Comparison
- sham
- Outcome
- Withdrawals due to adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Acupuncture vs sham acupuncture Withdrawals due to adverse events · patients with hip osteoarthritis The review found no eligible studies for this question. Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture for hip osteoarthritis 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Acupuncture vs NSAIDs · patients with hip osteoarthritis · 1 review
- Acupuncture vs advice plus exercise · patients with hip osteoarthritis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.