Question · asked by 1 review
Cemented implant crown vs Screw-retained implant crown: Mechanical complications / prosthesis failure (4 years)
- Population
- Patients with single-tooth implants receiving implant crowns; split-mouth
- Intervention
- Cemented implant crown
- Comparison
- Screw-retained implant crown
- Outcome
- Mechanical complications / prosthesis failure (4 years)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cemented implant crown vs Screw-retained implant crown Mechanical complications / prosthesis failure (4 years) · Patients with single-tooth implants receiving implant crowns; split-mouth · 4 years Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | No reports of any mechanical complications or failures with either type of prosthesis (narrative) | 1 study · 12 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.