Question · asked by 0 reviews
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Alternative periodontal treatment: Adverse events (participants with adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events)
- Population
- Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension
- Intervention
- Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment)
- Comparison
- Alternative periodontal treatment
- Outcome
- Adverse events (participants with adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events)
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo findings match. Try fewer words or remove a filter.
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs No treatment (no periodontal treatment) · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with… · 1 review
- Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs Supra-gingival scaling · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.