Question · asked by 1 review
0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase vs ciclosporin: Side effects
- Population
- People with erosive oral lichen planus
- Intervention
- 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase
- Comparison
- ciclosporin
- Outcome
- Side effects
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
0.1% triamcinolone acetonide in orabase vs Ciclosporin solution Side-effects reported · People with erosive oral lichen planus Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | Table 3 (Side-effects). Yoke 2006: no significant adverse events; transient burning sensation upon initial application with both treatments. | 1 study · 15 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.