Question · asked by 1 review
Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T and LRTI) vs trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction (T and LR): Quality of life ‐ not measured
- Population
- Patients with thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis
- Intervention
- Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T and LRTI)
- Comparison
- trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction (T and LR)
- Outcome
- Quality of life ‐ not measured
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T and LRTI) vs trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction (T and LR) Quality of life ‐ not measured · Patients with thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis The review found no eligible studies for this question. Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T and LRTI) vs trapeziectomy and interpositional arthroplasty (T and IA) · Patients with thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis · 1 review
- Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T and LRTI) vs trapeziectomy (T) · Patients with thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.