Question · asked by 1 review

An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks vs an extended NVP regimen administered to infants: HIV Transmission or Death at 24 months among those uninfected at birth

Population
Breastfeeding infants of HIV‐infected mothers
Intervention
An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks
Comparison
an extended NVP regimen administered to infants
Outcome
HIV Transmission or Death at 24 months among those uninfected at birth

An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14… showed no clear difference in HIV Transmission or Death at 24 months among those uninfected at birth compared with an extended NVP regimen administered to infants (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks vs an extended NVP regimen administered to infants
HIV Transmission or Death at 24 months among those uninfected at birth · Breastfeeding infants of HIV‐infected mothers1
An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14… showed no clear difference in HIV Transmission or Death at 24 months among those uninfected at birth compared with an extended NVP regimen administered to infants (moderate certainty).
Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 1 [0.75, 1.34]1 study · 1122 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV
2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.