Question · asked by 1 review

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Other methods (pooled: ART/glass ionomer cement, nano-silver fluoride, sodium fluoride varnish, placebo): Adverse effects (tooth staining and other side effects)

Population
Children and adults with active dental caries (aged 1-50; mostly preschool/school children with primary dentition)
Intervention
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
Comparison
Other methods (pooled: ART/glass ionomer cement, nano-silver fluoride, sodium fluoride varnish, placebo)
Outcome
Adverse effects (tooth staining and other side effects)

SDF commonly causes black staining of arrested lesions; only mild, transient adverse events were reported, with no major adverse events (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF; 38% in most trials, 30% in three) vs Other methods (pooled: ART/glass ionomer cement, nano-silver fluoride, sodium fluoride varnish, placebo)
Adverse effects (tooth staining; soft-tissue and systemic events) · Children and adults with active dental caries (aged 1-50; mostly preschool/school children with primary dentition) · up to 30 months, Children/adults with dental caries; multiple countries; community/clinic care setting not clearly specified
SDF commonly causes black staining of arrested lesions; only mild, transient adverse events were reported, with no major adverse events (ungraded).
The role of silver diamine fluoride as dental caries preventive and arresting agent: a systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
Black staining of arrested lesions reported in most studies; 4 studies reported mild transient events (gingival blenching/pain; diarrhea/stomachache; burning, bad taste, pain, mouth injury, dissatisfaction with…Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
The role of silver diamine fluoride as dental caries preventive and arresting agent: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
Not specified (publication window 2014-2024; references accessed July 2024)20Critically Low / Critically Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.