Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: Fibrin sealant vs usual care: Red cell transfusion requirements (mL) (
- Population
- people aged 18 and over undergoing vascular surgery
- Intervention
- Summary of findings: Fibrin sealant
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Red cell transfusion requirements (mL) (
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: Fibrin sealant vs usual care Red cell transfusions (units per participant) up to 30 days post surgery · people aged 18 and over undergoing vascular surgery The review found no eligible studies for this question. Drugs to reduce bleeding and transfusion in major open vascular or endovascular surgery: a systematic review… (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs to reduce bleeding and transfusion in major open vascular or endovascular surgery: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.