Question · asked by 1 review
Cytarabine plus high‐dose methotrexate vs high‐dose methotrexate alone: Serious adverse events
- Population
- patients with primary CNS lymphoma
- Intervention
- Cytarabine plus high‐dose methotrexate
- Comparison
- high‐dose methotrexate alone
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cytarabine plus high‐dose methotrexate vs high‐dose methotrexate alone Serious adverse events · patients with primary CNS lymphoma The review found no eligible studies for this question. Role of chemotherapy additional to high‐dose methotrexate for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Role of chemotherapy additional to high‐dose methotrexate for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.