Question · asked by 1 review

38% silver diamine fluoride vs Glass ionomer cement (GIC) plus fluoride varnish: Caries prevention (preventive fraction, SDF vs GIC+5% fluoride varnish)

Population
intellectually disabled individuals with caries in permanent posterior teeth
Intervention
38% silver diamine fluoride
Comparison
Glass ionomer cement (GIC) plus fluoride varnish
Outcome
Caries prevention (preventive fraction, SDF vs GIC+5% fluoride varnish)

SDF had a 45% preventative fraction versus glass ionomer cement plus fluoride varnish; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
38% SDF vs glass ionomer cement plus 5% fluoride varnish
Caries prevention (preventive fraction, SDF vs GIC+5% fluoride varnish) · intellectually disabled individuals with caries in permanent posterior teeth · 6 months, Odisha India
SDF had a 45% preventative fraction versus glass ionomer cement plus fluoride varnish; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes
Preventative fraction (%) 451 study · 82 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth.
2023 All outcomes
December 202213Low / Critically Low
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.