Summary of findings table ‐ mesh repair vs non‐mesh repair: Clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence within one year of repair
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ mesh repair changes clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence within one year of… compared with non‐mesh repair (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ mesh repair vs non‐mesh repair Clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence within one year of repair · adult patients with incarcerated or strangulated groin hernia It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ mesh repair changes clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence within one year of… compared with non‐mesh repair (very low certainty). Mesh versus non‐mesh for emergency groin hernia repair (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.19 [0.04, 1.03] | 2 studies · 104 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesh versus non‐mesh for emergency groin hernia repair 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.