Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs Complete caries removal: Progression of caries
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Stepwise excavation (two-stage caries removal, re-entry after an interval) vs One stage complete caries removal Progression of caries · Patients with carious teeth, affecting any tooth surface(s), in unrestored primary and permanent teeth The review found no eligible studies for this question. Operative caries management in adults and children (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | None of the eight included studies reported on the primary outcome of progression of caries. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operative caries management in adults and children 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-12 | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.