Question · asked by 1 review
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs acupuncture: Helkimo clinical dysfunction index
- Population
- Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity
- Intervention
- Stabilisation splint (SS)
- Comparison
- acupuncture
- Outcome
- Helkimo clinical dysfunction index
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Acupuncture Helkimo clinical dysfunction score · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 3 months or less Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome (2004) · Cochrane All outcomes | SS vs acupuncture (Johansson 1991): Helkimo clinical dysfunction score decreased significantly in both groups (P<0.01) with no significant between-group difference; data not available for a pooled estimate. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2001-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Biofeedback/stress management · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 1 review
- Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Bite plates · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.