Question · asked by 0 reviews
Mouth self-examination (MSE) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative): Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD
- Population
- Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms, attending an organised screening programme or screened during attendance at a dental or other clinical practice examination
- Intervention
- Mouth self-examination (MSE)
- Comparison
- Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)
- Outcome
- Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo findings match. Try fewer words or remove a filter.
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Mouth self-examination (MSE) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative) · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.