Question · asked by 1 review

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs Healthy controls without cleft: Oral microbiota composition

Population
Individuals assessed for oral microbiota (mainly children and adolescents)
Intervention
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P)
Comparison
Healthy controls without cleft
Outcome
Oral microbiota composition

Oral microbiota composition differs between persons with orofacial cleft and healthy controls, synthesized qualitatively across 8 studies but not meta-analyzed (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Orofacial cleft (cleft lip and/or palate) as exposure vs Healthy controls without cleft
Oral microbiota composition · Individuals assessed for oral microbiota (mainly children and adolescents) · Clinical oral/salivary microbial sampling; various countries
Oral microbiota composition differs between persons with orofacial cleft and healthy controls, synthesized qualitatively across 8 studies but not meta-analyzed (ungraded).
Oral health in patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of… (2025) All outcomes
no estimate extracted8 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral health in patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of periodontal and dental disease and…
2025 All outcomes
March 2023 to January 202430Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.