Question · asked by 1 review
Saline rinse vs usual or supportive care: Incidence of VAP
- Population
- Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU
- Intervention
- Saline rinse
- Comparison
- usual or supportive care
- Outcome
- Incidence of VAP
Saline rinse led to lower incidence of VAP compared with usual care (no rinse); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Saline rinse vs Usual care (no rinse) Incidence of VAP · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU Saline rinse led to lower incidence of VAP compared with usual care (no rinse); GRADE not reported. Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 0.60 [0.39, 0.91] | 2 studies · 324 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator‐associated pneumonia 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2020-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Saline rinse vs Saline-soaked swab · Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation in ICU · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.