Question · asked by 0 reviews
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery): Attachment change
- Population
- Patients with chronic adult periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and early-onset periodontitis excluded
- Intervention
- GTR rm associated with bone substitutes
- Comparison
- Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
- Outcome
- Attachment change
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo findings match. Try fewer words or remove a filter.
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- GTR rm associated with bone substitutes vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony… · 1 review
- GTR rm associated with bone substitutes vs Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) · Adults with localised or multiple recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3… · 0 reviews
- GTR rm associated with bone substitutes vs Guided tissue regeneration, resorbable membrane (GTR rm) · Adults with localised or multiple recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.