Question · asked by 1 review
Biofunctional Prosthetic System (BPS): closed-mouth two stage-two step final impression with addition silicone elastomer vs Conventional complete denture technique (CCD): open-mouth two stage-two step conventional technique using elastomer: Oral health-related quality of life
- Population
- Completely edentulous people
- Intervention
- Biofunctional Prosthetic System (BPS): closed-mouth two stage-two step final impression with addition silicone elastomer
- Comparison
- Conventional complete denture technique (CCD): open-mouth two stage-two step conventional technique using elastomer
- Outcome
- Oral health-related quality of life
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Biofunctional Prosthetic System (BPS): closed-mouth two stage-two step final impression with addition silicone elastomer vs Conventional complete denture technique (CCD): open-mouth two stage-two step conventional technique using elastomer Participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) · Completely edentulous people · 3 months Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | OHIP-EDENT median scores: BPS 34.5; CCD 35.8. No clear difference between groups | 1 study · 10 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.