Question · asked by 1 review
Motivational interviewing vs other active intervention: Extent of substance use at short‐term
- Population
- people with substance use (adults, young adults, adolescents)
- Intervention
- Motivational interviewing
- Comparison
- other active intervention
- Outcome
- Extent of substance use at short‐term
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Motivational interviewing vs other active intervention Extent of substance use post‐intervention · people with substance use (adults, young adults, adolescents) Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 338 participants | Low |
Motivational interviewing vs other active intervention Extent of substance use at short‐term · people with substance use (adults, young adults, adolescents) Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 18 studies · 2795 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Motivational interviewing vs treatment · people with substance use (adults, young adults, adolescents) · 1 review
- Motivational interviewing vs no intervention · people with substance use (adults, young adults, adolescents) · 1 review
- Motivational interviewing vs assessment and feedback · people with substance use (adults, young adults, adolescents) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.