Question · asked by 0 reviews
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery): Sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (proportion)
- Population
- Patients with chronic adult periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony defects; furcation-involved teeth and early-onset periodontitis excluded
- Intervention
- Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable)
- Comparison
- Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)
- Outcome
- Sites failing to gain 2 mm attachment (proportion)
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo findings match. Try fewer words or remove a filter.
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with barrier membrane (resorbable or non-resorbable) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery) · Patients with chronic periodontitis (aged 21 years or older) with periodontal infra-bony… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.