Question · asked by 1 review
Hyperbaric oxygen (following replantation) vs control: Pulpal healing at 12 months
- Population
- People with avulsed and replanted permanent (front) teeth
- Intervention
- Hyperbaric oxygen (following replantation)
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Pulpal healing at 12 months
It is very uncertain whether hyperbaric oxygen (following replantation) changes pulpal healing at 12 months compared with control (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hyperbaric oxygen (following replantation) vs Control Pulpal healing at 12 months · People with avulsed and replanted permanent (front) teeth · 12 months It is very uncertain whether hyperbaric oxygen (following replantation) changes pulpal healing at 12 months compared with control (very low certainty). Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.25 [1.06, 1.48] | 1 study · 69 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.