Question · asked by 1 review

IV iron isomaltoside vs oral iron: Serious adverse events ‐ remission or mild disease (8 weeks)

It is very uncertain whether IV iron isomaltoside changes serious adverse events ‐ remission or mild disease (8 weeks) compared with oral iron sulphate (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
IV iron isomaltoside vs oral iron sulphate
Serious adverse events ‐ remission or mild disease (8 weeks) · IBD patients
It is very uncertain whether IV iron isomaltoside changes serious adverse events ‐ remission or mild disease (8 weeks) compared with oral iron sulphate (very low certainty).
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4.02 [0.51, 31.73]1 study · 338 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.