Question · asked by 1 review
Animal‐assisted therapy (AAT (live animal)) vs no AAT: Behaviour
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Animal‐assisted therapy (AAT) vs no AAT Behaviour measured using NHBPS (0–116, higher score indicates more severe behaviour problem), NPI (0–144, higher score indicates more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms) or MOSES Disoriented Behaviour subscale (8–32, higher score indicates more seve... · dementia Animal‐assisted therapy for dementia (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 142 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Animal‐assisted therapy for dementia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.