Question · asked by 1 review

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone: Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)

Population
Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
Intervention
Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing
Comparison
Toothbrushing alone
Outcome
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Toothbrushing alone
Periodontitis (probing pocket depth) · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
Periodontitis measured in one study but useable data not provided (Walsh 1989 reported proportion of sites with >4 mm pocket depth at 3 months but not mean PD; attachment loss measured but no data).1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental…
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2019-01-16Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.