Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) vs usual care: Length of hospital stay
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) vs usual care Length of hospital stay – non‐randomised studies · adult on acute hospital wards at risk of clinical deterioration The review found no eligible studies for this question. Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) vs usual care Length of hospital stay – randomised trials ( · adult on acute hospital wards at risk of clinical deterioration Early warning systems (EWS) and rapid response systems (RRS) may leads to lower length of hospital stay – randomised trials ( compared with usual care (low certainty). Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 0.91 [0.83, 0.98] | 2733 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.