Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months: Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)
- Population
- Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental practice)
- Intervention
- Routine scale and polish every 6 months
- Comparison
- Routine scale and polish every 12 months
- Outcome
- Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness)
It is very uncertain whether routine scale and polish every 6 months changes participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness) compared with routine scale and polish every 12 months (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months Participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness) · Dentate adults without severe periodontitis, regularly attending for dental care in primary care (UK general dental… · 36 months It is very uncertain whether routine scale and polish every 6 months changes participant satisfaction (perceived oral cleanliness) compared with routine scale and polish every 12 months (very low certainty). Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.11 [0.85, 1.47] | 1 study · 207 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2018-01-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Routine scale and polish every 6 months vs Routine scale and polish every 12 months · Healthy dentate adults with mild to moderate gingivitis, without severe periodontitis · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.