Question · asked by 1 review
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) as an adjunct to conventional therapy vs conventional therapy: Quality of life
- Population
- People with established (manifest) MRONJ
- Intervention
- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) as an adjunct to conventional therapy
- Comparison
- conventional therapy
- Outcome
- Quality of life
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) as an adjunct to conventional therapy vs Conventional therapy Quality of life · People with established (manifest) MRONJ · 6 months Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes | QoL measured with the Duke Health Profile; only within-group comparisons were provided; no score values, so a between-group analysis was not possible. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.