UCM vs ECC: Severe intraventricular haemorrhage
UCM showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4) compared with ECC (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
UCM vs ECC Severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4) · babies born preterm, and their mothers. UCM showed no clear difference in severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH grades 3, 4) compared with ECC (low certainty). Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at… (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.75 [0.39, 1.45] | 6 studies · 618 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.