Question · asked by 1 review

Metronidazole + SRP vs SRP: Probing pocket depth

Population
Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive)
Intervention
Metronidazole + SRP
Comparison
SRP
Outcome
Probing pocket depth

It is very uncertain whether metronidazole + SRP changes probing pocket depth compared with SRP (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 66.7%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Metronidazole + SRP vs SRP
Probing pocket depth · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive) · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
It is very uncertain whether metronidazole + SRP changes probing pocket depth compared with SRP (very low certainty).
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -1.11 [-2.84, 0.61]2 studies · 47 participantsVery low
Metronidazole + SRP vs SRP
Probing pocket depth · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive) · Intermediate-term (> 3 months to < 1 year)
Metronidazole + SRP led to lower probing pocket depth compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.59 [-0.95, -0.23]4 studies · 94 participantsGRADE not reported
Metronidazole + SRP vs SRP
Probing pocket depth · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive) · Short-term (≤ 3 months)
Metronidazole + SRP showed no clear difference in probing pocket depth compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.10 [-0.37, 0.16]4 studies · 108 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis
2020 · Cochrane All outcomes
2020-03Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.