Chinese herbal medicines vs placebo: Adverse events (Analysis 1.7) Participant's report
- Population
- atopic eczema
- Intervention
- Chinese herbal medicines
- Comparison
- placebo
- Outcome
- Adverse events (Analysis 1.7) Participant's report
CHM showed no clear difference in adverse events (Analysis 1.7) Participant's report compared with placebo (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CHM vs placebo Adverse events (Analysis 1.7) Participant's report · Participants with atopic eczema CHM showed no clear difference in adverse events (Analysis 1.7) Participant's report compared with placebo (low certainty). Chinese herbal medicine for atopic eczema (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.71 [0.06, 8.67] | 2 studies · 129 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese herbal medicine for atopic eczema 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Chinese herbal medicines vs drugs · atopic eczema · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.