Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control: Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis:
Parent‐infant psychotherapy may leads to higher infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: · participants with improving parental and infant mental health Parent‐infant psychotherapy may leads to higher infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: compared with control (low certainty). Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 3.3 [1.82, 6] | 2 studies · 129 participants | Low |
Parent‐infant psychotherapy vs control Infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: · participants with improving parental and infant mental health It is very uncertain whether parent‐infant psychotherapy changes infant attachment categories meta‐analysis: compared with control (very low certainty). Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.8 [0.29, 2.19] | 2 studies · 129 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent‐infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.