Question · asked by 1 review
PDHA program with robust prevention vs PDHA program or PDHA program with intensive staffing: Tooth decay-free children
- Population
- Alaska children aged 5 to 18 years
- Intervention
- PDHA program with robust prevention
- Comparison
- PDHA program or PDHA program with intensive staffing
- Outcome
- Tooth decay-free children
The robust prevention PDHA model was projected to yield more than 50% tooth decay-free children versus 8% with other PDHA models, without a GRADE rating.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PDHA program with robust prevention vs PDHA program or PDHA program with intensive staffing Tooth decay-free children · Alaska children aged 5 to 18 years · 20 years, Alaska The robust prevention PDHA model was projected to yield more than 50% tooth decay-free children versus 8% with other PDHA models, without a GRADE rating. Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions… (2013) All outcomes | Percentage tooth decay-free >50% vs 8% | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reducing Alaska Native paediatric oral health disparities: a systematic review of oral health interventions and a case study on multilevel… 2013 All outcomes | October 5, 2012 | 11 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.