Question · asked by 1 review
Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparotomy: Pelvic pain
- Population
- women having gynaecological surgery
- Intervention
- Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose
- Comparison
- no treatment at laparotomy
- Outcome
- Pelvic pain
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Analysis 2 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparotomy Pelvic pain · women having gynaecological surgery The review found no eligible studies for this question. Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Analysis 1 ‐ Oxidised regenerated cellulose vs no treatment at laparoscopy · women having gynaecological surgery · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.