Question · asked by 1 review

Thalidomide (systemic; 100 mg or 300 mg daily) vs placebo: Safety of the intervention (adverse effects)

Population
People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically; primary care
Intervention
Thalidomide (systemic; 100 mg or 300 mg daily)
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Safety of the intervention (adverse effects)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Thalidomide (systemic; 100 mg or 300 mg daily) vs Placebo
Safety of the intervention including adverse effects · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · Males only
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane All outcomes
Hamuryudan 1998: significant adverse effects including severe sedation, polyneuropathy, loss of libido, and weight gain; a greater number of adverse events was seen for the higher (300 mg) dose; 4 patients withdrew due…1 study · 101 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease
2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
2013-10Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.