Same question across reviews · CL0373

unknown :: Unclassified intervention -> Secondary caries

ProposalThis cluster groups questions by review type, intervention category and outcome domain. It is a proposal pending human validation, so questions in it may differ in population, comparator or timing.
Reviews
2
Questions
42
current versions
GRADE rated
0
Review overlap (CCA)
NR
over all included studies of these reviews, not this question only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Coverage: Covering cost of minimally invasive treatment
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 7.47 [5.63, 9.93]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Continent: Asia
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 6.51 [4.64, 9.13]11 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: High
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 8.20 [6.93, 9.70]7 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: Low
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 6.16 [4.45, 8.52]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: Very high
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 2.98 [2.23, 3.98]10 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Coverage: Not covering
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 6.64 [4.83, 9.11]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Continent: Africa
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 11.43 [7.88, 16.56]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: Very high
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 6.56 [4.37, 9.86]10 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: Medium
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 0.70 [0.05, 10.26]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: Medium
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 5.73 [2.83, 11.57]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: High
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 2.54 [1.69, 3.81]7 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · HDI: Low
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 2.45 [1.73, 3.48]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Coverage: Not covering
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 2.53 [1.70, 3.78]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Coverage: Covering cost of minimally invasive treatment
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 2.28 [1.69, 3.08]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Continent: South America
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 7.62 [5.59, 10.38]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries · Continent: Europe
Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational… (2025)
RR 6.53 [4.35, 9.81]6 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Use of coat: No
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.935 [0.862, 0.971]9 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Assessor blinding (triple-blind): Yes
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.859 [0.794, 0.906]18 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Use of cavity conditioner: Yes
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.892 [0.796, 0.946]13 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Material type: High-viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC)
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.831 [0.692, 0.915]8 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Dentist experience: Non-experienced
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.921 [0.711, 0.982]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Material type: Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.954 [0.879, 0.983]6 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Cavity form: Conventional cavity design
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.932 [0.889, 0.959]20 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Study design: Randomized controlled trial
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.913 [0.849, 0.951]15 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Material type: Resin-based material + total-etching adhesion
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.894 [0.771, 0.954]7 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Random assignment: No/Incorrect
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.899 [0.828, 0.943]15 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Material type: Open sandwich restoration
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.950 [0.677, 0.994]1 studyUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Rubber dam isolation: Yes
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.911 [0.825, 0.957]11 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Financial source: Public
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.895 [0.822, 0.941]12 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Assessor blinding (triple-blind): No
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.958 [0.924, 0.978]12 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Study design: Nonrandomized controlled trial
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.865 [0.759, 0.929]11 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Material type: Resin-based material + self-etching adhesion
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.924 [0.847, 0.963]8 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Study design: Noncontrolled trial
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.942 [0.837, 0.981]4 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Dentist experience: Experienced
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.908 [0.861, 0.941]28 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Use of cavity conditioner: No
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.965 [0.787, 0.995]2 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Financial source: Private or mixed
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.851 [0.679, 0.939]5 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Rubber dam isolation: No
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.899 [0.829, 0.942]16 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Use of coat: Yes
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.801 [0.619, 0.909]6 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Reporting bias: Yes
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.963 [0.847, 0.992]3 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Cavity form: Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.853 [0.751, 0.918]10 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Reporting bias: No
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.902 [0.853, 0.935]27 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Absence of recurrent caries success rate · Random assignment: Correct
Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis. (2020)
Proportion 0.914 [0.849, 0.953]15 studiesUngraded

Filter these questions further